Godse and Gandhi – Truth or Fiction?

I’m unable to authenticate the below text for its truth. However, I do agree with certain ideas that it puts forward. I have always blamed (and still do) Gandhi for the partition of India. As I’ve said, none of what follows may be true, but it is definitely worth a read.

Godse is often a misunderstood character. He is referred to as a Hindu fanatic. It is often hard to understand Godse because the Government of India had suppressed information about him. His court statements, letters etc. were all banned from the public until recently. Judging from his writings one thing becomes very clear – He was no fanatic. His court statements are very well read out and indicate a calm and collected mental disposition. He never even once speaks ill about Gandhi as a person, but only attacks Gandhi’s policies which caused ruin and untold misery to Hindus. Another interesting point to note is that Godse had been working with the Hindu refugees fleeing from Pakistan. He had seen the horrible atrocities committed on them. Many women had their hands cut off, nose cut off, even little girls had been raped mercilessly. Despite this Godse did not harm even single Muslim in India which he could easily have. So it would be a grave mistake to call him a Hindu fanatic.

Let us start by studying the motive behind Godse’s act. By seeing the nature of the assassination in public space and Godse’s act of turning himself over to the Police, we can see that Godse did not do this for personal reasons. He very well knew that he would be hanged and his name would be disgraced as Gandhi was considered a saint. And again Godse could have ran away and escaped punishment. But he did the reverse. He called a police officer and courted arrest. Before we proceed it would be wise to understand the backdrop of the assassination.

The central government had taken a decision — Pakistan will not be given Rs 55 crores. On January 13 Gandhi started a fast unto death that Pakistan must be given the money. On January 13, the central government changed its earlier decision and announced that Pakistan would be given the amount. On January 13, Nathuram decided to assassinate Gandhi.

Nathuram Godse was a learned man, very sharp and intelligent – editor of “Agrani” (one of the most famous newspaper of that time – with Nana Aapte). In his last editorial of “Agrani” which he changed overnight – he said “Gandhi must be stopped – at any cost” and he justified why Gandhiji’s assassination was not only inevitable but also a delayed action, sth tht shud’ve happened LONG AGO.

In Nathuram’s words – ” I don’t refute Gandhi’s theory of non-violence. He may be a saint but he is not a politician. His theory of non-violence denies self-defence and self-interest. The non-violence that defines the fight for survival as violence is a theory not of non-violence but of self-destruction.The division of the nation was an unnecessary decision. What was the percentage of the Muslim population as compared to the population of the nation? There was no need for a separate nation. Had it been a just demand, Maulana Azad would not have stayed back in India. But because Jinnah insisted and because Gandhi took his side, India was divided, in spite of opposition from the nation, the Cabinet. An individual is never greater than a nation.

In a democracy you cannot put forward your demands at knife-point. Jinnah did it and Gandhi stabbed the nation with the same knife. He dissected the land and gave a piece to Pakistan. We did picket that time but in vain. The Father of our Nation went to perform his paternal duties for Pakistan! Gandhi blackmailed the cabinet with his fast unto death. His body, his threats to die are causing the destruction — geographical as well as economical — of the nation. Today, Muslims have taken a part of the nation, tomorrow Sikhs may ask for Punjab. The religions are again dividend into castes, they will demand sub-divisions of the divisions. What remains of the concept of one nation, national integration? Why did we fight the British in unison for independence? Why not separately? Bhagat Singh did not ask only for an independent Punjab or Subhash Chandra Bose for an independent Bengal?

I am going to assassinate him in the open, before the public, because I am going to do it as my duty. If I do it surreptitiously, it becomes a crime in my own eyes. I will not try to escape, I will surrender and naturally I will be hanged. One assassination, one hanging. I don’t want two executions for one assassination and I don’t want your involvement, participation or company. (This was for Nana-Apte and Veer Savarkar as they were against ghandhi’s policies too, Godse wanted to assassinate gandhi all by himself and took promise from Nana Apte that he will continue helping Veer Savarkar in rebuilding India as a strong free nation.)

On January 30, I reached Birla Bhavan at 12 pm. Gandhi was sitting outside on a cot enjoying the sunshine. Vallabhbhai Patel’s granddaughter was sitting at his feet. I had the revolver with me. I could have assassinated him easily then, but I was convinced that his assassination was to be a punishment and a sentence against him, and I would execute him. I wanted witnesses for the execution but there were none. I did not want to escape after the execution as there was not an iota of guilt in my mind. I wanted to surrender, but surrender to whom? There was a good crowd to collect for the evening prayers. I decided on the evening of January 30 as the date for Gandhi’s execution.

Gandhi climbed the steps and came forward. He had kept his hands on the shoulders of the two girls. I wanted just three seconds more. I moved two steps forward and faced Gandhi. Now I wanted to take out the revolver and salute him for whatever sacrifice and service he had made for the nation. One of the two girls was dangerously close to Gandhi and I was afraid that she might be injured in the course of firing. As a precautionary measure I went one more step ahead, bowed before him and gently pushed the girl away from the firing line. The next moment I fired at Gandhi. Gandhi was very weak, there was a feeble sound like ‘aah’ (There are proof that Gandhi did NOT say “Hey Raam” at that time – it’s just made up stuff ) from him and he fell down.

After the firing I raised my hand holding the revolver and shouted, ‘Police, police’. For 30 seconds nobody came forward and I scanned the crowd. I saw a police officer. I signalled to him to come forward and arrest me. He came and caught my wrist, then a second man came and touched the revolver… I let it go…”

I cannot accept Gandhi as the father of the nation. Ever.

12 responses to “Godse and Gandhi – Truth or Fiction?”

  1. i consent with you i dont think he should be father of our nation. Gandhi and people using his name are cult to our great nation.

    • SS-

      I agree with you partly – about him being the father of the nation. However, if you look more clearly, the people who are using his name (politicians aside) are tangible, honest people who are trying to live Gandhi’s ‘good’ principles. I do not have a problem with that. I wouldn’t call them a cult. However, when actions of such groups of people become detriment to the nation’s integrity, that’s when I’d object to it.

      Thanks for stopping by.

  2. Manoj, Even I can write such stories about Veerappan which will make us think and claim he killed Elephants for the sake of Karnataka.. Where is the proof that Godse exhibited such character..??? Unfortunately, nobody knows the truth about partition.. Why are you anti Gandhi..??? BTW, the new interface is very nice 🙂

    • Okay, first things first. I do not hate Gandhi and I do not feel reverence for Godse. I hate the fact that one man’s word caused a whole nation to be broken. That the one man who had in all his power to stop exactly what the British did (divide and rule), did not see that it was happening again. That one man, who could have actually gone against it and unite both the nations chose to act differently. See, it is this act of his that I hate. It still gives me the creeps.

      To be perfectly honest, I do not hate or like Veerappan. I do condone his acts. It is the person’s choice of act that I hate and the act itself.

      Damn! I hope you don’t get the idea that I hate a lot of things because I used that word a lot. LOL! I’m sure you realize (knowing me) that it is quite the opposite. 🙂

      Cheers. It was the best theme I found on wordpress. I liked it a lot too! 🙂

    • risingbharat-

      I did not write this article. I only found it on the internet. Please do not consider it an eye-opener. Just simply because it has not been validated. I only posted it because it made me think. And I’m sure it had the same effect on you. But unless verified, I’d suggest you take it with a pinch of salt – like I did. 🙂

      Thank you for stopping by. 🙂

  3. Hi manoj, Absolutely aware of your disclaimers. But same as you I am not a big fan of Gandhiji’s methods but I don’t hate him. I admire some of his qualities and indebted to few of his sacrifices for the nation.

  4. Hehehhe… I agree with you. What I meant was that there must be some important link that we are all missing about Partition. Something we don’t know. (I strongly suspect Nehru and Jinnah). My opinion is that a mahatma like Gandhi wouldn’t have considered partition just like that. Without knowing this, people blame him. Anyway, I’ll try to do some research on it.

    My comment was only on the article :).. Of course I know what you are 🙂 🙂

    • True Tej. We are missing vital information of what happened during that time. I hope the people responsible for it are at the least, regretting their actions.

      Looking forward to your research! 🙂

  5. Aloha Manoj,
    I remember reading part of this history way back when. Nationalism is not part of reading matter these days but I will remember this post and some day thanks to you my hungry brain will have something to chew on

  6. One major reason for acceptance of partition by Congress was their haste in accepting power at any cost. If the same could have been delayed as per original plans of partition , it was a strong possibility that Congress alone could not have acceded power but Hindu Maha Sabha could have grabbed power, as people would have seen that Congress had failed to stop partition. In such a eventuality we would have Veer Savarkar as President of Free India

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: